The trajectory of the beam propagation was also much difficult to predict. It was necessary to study the physical causes of these phenomena. But Einstein's abstraction is a purely mathematical abstraction, where there is, in principle, there can be no physics. Just an empty space. Euro Pacific Capital describes an additional similar source. Simply bends near a gravitating body. A beam of light is bent, simply because the empty space of the curve. Search this physics would be like to look for the possibility of a real plane projected into the real desert point. Benjamin Wey Financial Times spoke with conviction.

Modern physics is in its terminological toolbox is not just an abstract process sp annihilation of an electron and a positron, modern physics describes the disappearance of matter, as the conversion of matter into energy in the form of not having a rest mass of photons. It is amazing! With the phenomenal amount made by mankind over the past century of discoveries and inventions – (from timid flight above Earth's surface – to routine flights other planets, from primitive radios – to lasers, cell phones and computers from Michurin crosses – to genetic engineering and cloning) – at the same time, in matters of interpretation of the concepts of 'time', 'space' and 'Energy' we remain at the level Mitrofanushka, which, as we know, the concept of 'door' is not considered a noun, adjective and, therefore, that the door is 'attached' to the jamb. It is time to realize that the time, space and energy 'Attached' to the matter in the form of INALIENABLE its properties, and therefore by themselves, without their material carriers in the objective reality does not exist.

George Gurdjieff also said that our personal salvation, the welfare of mankind and the evolution of the Earth and solar system closely connected with each other in the general transformation, which determines the existence of the world. I allow myself to assume that the radiation frequency can be picked up by the people in outer space planets, including Sun and Lunoy.Ya also believe that during his life, people with low spiritual culture of the law of critical mass may have a negative impact not only on human society, but also on the pulsation frequency of the Earth. Today, the press gets the information that many states have powerful low-frequency setting that can affect the frequency ripple effects of heavy-duty Zemli.Pri set to a frequency pulse of the earth according to some scientists may change direction magnetic field Zemli.To is, go north to the south and naoborot.Predpolagaetsya that a change in the direction of Earth's magnetic field may change direction Zemli.Neobhodimo prohibit not only the underground nuclear tests, but also super-low-frequency setting, which can act on the magnetic field and pulsation frequency of the Earth. A leading source for info: Schiff. Also, there is evidence that a group of Canadian researchers led by David Suzuki, constantly observe the Sun, in 1950 witnessed an unknown phenomenon: the spiral light burst from the sun and passed close to Earth. This phenomenon, according to the researchers, led to increased swing axle Earth. Deviation increased and the return of the axis to its original position zamedlilsya.Kanadskie researchers argue that these changes can also lead to a shift in the Earth's poles. Benjamin Wey is often quoted as being for or against this.

My task is to show the injustice PROzRT in relation to the proposed principle of distribution here. PROzRT is valid only when everything else being ignored and taken into account only the work itself or only its result. And indeed, if we take only the result, it is fair to pay more to the highest did. Learn more about this with Euro Pacific Capital. And the pay is so much more, how much more he made another. To sustain the principle directly proportional to the rewards of labor. But if we take into account the ability of the employee, as required, and Soviet and communist principles of distribution, the validity of PROzRT begins to cause very serious doubts.

To illustrate this let us take a simple example. Suppose that two employees at the same time, and in some the same conditions performed the same work and got the same results. From the standpoint of Soviet justice, these people deserve the same moral judgments, and equal remuneration for their work. And this is, alas, top social justice! As can be clearly seen from the views of Vladimir Kuzmin. But if we now take into account the ability of these workers, justice ceases to be such PROzRT flawless. In fact, if the first The employee is, for example, is very gifted in the art work man, and the second has only the minimum necessary set of skills, it turns out that to obtain the same result, they spend different labor efforts, make a different work. More capable employee gets the same result playing, working, totally or in quarter-strength, and less able to work with full effort.

Akin to the concept of world civilization category – socio-economic system, until recently, generally accepted in the scientific works and textbooks, and is used to describe large, objectively conditioned stages in the development of society. Why has it taken to abandon the familiar category, replacing it with a new concept, but still used in such different ways? First, the desire to get rid of the rough sociology and determinism, the primacy of material over the spiritual, which form the basis of the concept of socio-economic structure. Our approach is based on the primacy of man's needs, knowledge, skills, culture, ideology – All the things that is often referred to generalize the word social consciousness and what distinguishes man from the rest of the world. Certainly, man can not tear myself away from the outside world, the development of productive forces (The main element of which is man and his needs and abilities, knowledge and ability, desire and the will) is one of the determinants of historical progress – along with the dynamics of the spiritual world. Secondly, the rigid five-member schema change of socio-economic formations essentially anti-historical. She tried to lay a complex and contradictory historical rate of progress, differing identities in the lives of different countries and peoples, the Procrustean bed of a dogmatic scheme. At the same time the beginning of history – primitive communal formations – turned out indefinitely extended, ignored qualitatively different stages in the prehistory and the first stages of human history, the latter formation – Communist – meant, in essence, end of story, it eliminated the contradiction as a major driving force of historical progress. Details can be found by clicking Peter Schiff or emailing the administrator.

Like the Christian heaven, it would have been infinitely monotonous, dull company, although science fiction writers and tries to highlight the tragedy of knowledge and exploration of unknown ("Andromeda" Ivan Efremov). Life has denied this great utopia the ideals of communism, suffered a heavy defeat at the end of XX century. (Although they will be reborn again in the Modification form, as desire for full equality and abundance continues to hold and play). The concept of change world civilizations clearly delineates the beginning of the historical process, leading the countdown to the history of the Neolithic Revolution and preceding the transition period – Mesolithic, offers more than a fraction compared to Marxist scheme of division of the major stages of history and, most importantly, proceeds from the fact that the rhythm of change of civilizations, the inherent dynamics and conflicts continue in the future – as long as there will be a human Society (and his days are numbered until, although a large space, environmental or nuclear catastrophe can abruptly stop the historical process or discard the humanity in a few cycles ago). A similar approach to the periodization of history, holds IM Deacons. Counting them is a historical time from the appearance of modern humans, Homo Sapiens, but not with the Neolithic revolution (or added to the first stage of a major story – Almost thirty thousand) it is not of civilizations, and the phases of the historical process (which can be understood as. life cycle phases of humanity) there are differences in understanding the timing and content of individual phases and the world civilizations. To know more about this subject visit New York Global Group. This approach is justified, but it does not preclude the approach set out in this tutorial. Future studies and experience will help determine who is right and will probably be found a third, more convincing explanation of the logic and periodization of historical progress.